![]() |
| A petition to annul last month's election results by Maldives President Abdulla Yameen has been rejected by the country's Supreme Court (AFP Photo/Ahmed SHURAU) |
Colombo (AFP) - The Maldives' top court Sunday ended weeks of uncertainty by rejecting strongman President Abdulla Yameen's controversial bid to annul last month's election results, upholding his landslide defeat to an opposition candidate.
The
five-judge Supreme Court bench unanimously ruled that Yameen had failed to
prove his claim that the election was rigged and a fresh poll was necessary in
the Indian Ocean archipelago.
Under
international pressure, Yameen initially conceded defeat in the September 23
poll.
But he then
filed an appeal this month, throwing the island nation into turmoil and
attracting warnings from the United States and regional superpower India to
respect the outcome.
Yameen
claimed magic ink had been used to rig the election and that votes marked for
him disappeared inside ballot boxes.
Opposition
activists celebrated outside the Supreme Court in the capital Male after the
decision was read out, effectively drawing a line under Yameen's five years of
iron-fisted rule.
"After
weeks of uncertainty, the Maldivian people can finally enjoy clarity regarding
the outcome of the election," said President-elect Ibrahim Mohamed Solih,
who swept September's poll in an unexpected landslide victory.
"The
petition to annul the election was frivolous from the start, and spoke more
about an inability in some quarters to accept defeat, than any genuine concerns
about the vote."
Opposition
legislator Mariya Didi said Yameen -- who lobbied the Supreme Court in 2013 to
nullify election results in his favour -- should now allow a smooth transition
of power.
"We
are pleased that the court ruled unanimously to uphold the will of the
people," Didi said on Twitter.
"The
case was based on conjecture and conspiracy theories."
The
country's independent Elections Commission, through its lawyers, had argued his
petition was based on false allegations and should be dismissed.
Fresh
uncertainty
The Supreme
Court bench last week refused to accept the testimony of three unnamed
witnesses that Yameen's lawyers said would prove the election was fixed.
The next
day Yameen went on national television to concede defeat a second time, making
no reference to his controversial legal bid.
"This
is my final address to the nation before I leave," said the 59-year-old,
whose term in office ends on November 17.
"During
my tenure, the most difficult thing for me was my failure to learn about the
people. I just couldn't find out what shapes their wishes."
Ahead of
court hearings in the capital Male last week, the United States warned
"appropriate measures" would be taken if the will of the Maldivian
people was undermined.
Europe and
India have also issued similar warnings in the past.
The
situation was similar to 2013, when Yameen convinced the Supreme Court to
nullify the first round of voting, which he was trailing to opposition
candidate Mohamed Nasheed.
A
subsequent vote was then twice delayed, allowing Yameen time to forge alliances
that helped him narrowly win a contested run-off.
He has
ruled with an iron fist ever since, crushing dissent and jailing or exiling all
his major opponents.
In
February, Yameen jailed the chief justice and another Supreme Court judge after
accusing them of trying to topple him.
Yameen had
initially suspended the court, parliament and the constitution and declared a
state of emergency when legislators were about to impeach him.
Since his
election defeat, several high-profile political prisoners including his
estranged half-brother Maumoon Abdul Gayoom, who ruled the Maldives for 30
years until 2008, have been released from jail.
The US and
its allies have been concerned by growing Chinese influence in the
strategically positioned Indian Ocean archipelago, especially under Yameen's
authoritarian rule.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.