Yahoo – AFP,
Hwang Sunghee, September 12, 2017
Seoul (AFP) - The UN Security Council has unanimously adopted new sanctions on North Korea, including restrictions on oil shipments, to punish Pyongyang for its sixth and largest nuclear test.
![]() |
| North Korea has shrugged off numerous sets of sanctions aimed at crimping its nuclear and missile programmes, and this month unveiled what it said was a working hydrogen bomb (AFP Photo/STR) |
Seoul (AFP) - The UN Security Council has unanimously adopted new sanctions on North Korea, including restrictions on oil shipments, to punish Pyongyang for its sixth and largest nuclear test.
But
Washington toned down its initial proposals to secure backing from China and
Russia.
Here are
some key questions on UNSC resolution 2375, and its attempt to end the North's
nuclear weapons and missile programmes.
What impact
will the oil measures have?
The new
resolution ends natural gas shipments to North Korea, caps crude oil shipments
at their current levels, and puts a ceiling on refined oil products such as
petrol and diesel.
North Korea
has little oil of its own, relying on imports to keep its citizens and soldiers
moving.
The US
initially sought an oil embargo, which China -- North Korea's sole ally and
main trading partner -- strongly opposed.
Instead the
resolution limits crude oil shipments from any country to the amount sent to
the North in the last 12 months.
Beijing
does not publish statistics for crude oil shipments to the North, shrouding the
issue in secrecy, but is believed to supply around 4 million barrels a year.
The resolution also limits the North to importing 2 million barrels a year of refined oil products -- representing a 15 percent cut based on UN-WTO International Trade Centre estimates, although some analysts put the effect as high as 56 percent.
![]() |
Chart
showing the value of North Korea's refined oil imports 2012 to 2016,
with China
and Russia's share of the yearly total. Non-photo version. (AFP
Photo/John SAEKI)
|
The resolution also limits the North to importing 2 million barrels a year of refined oil products -- representing a 15 percent cut based on UN-WTO International Trade Centre estimates, although some analysts put the effect as high as 56 percent.
"It's
a red light for the growth of the North Korean economy," said Cheong
Seong-Chang of Seoul's Sejong Institute, "but will not have huge impact on
North Korea's military because the crude oil supply remains the same".
Crucially,
the resolution includes an exemption for "livelihood purposes" --
similar to clauses in past resolutions that have been used as loopholes.
Kim
Hyun-Wook, professor at the Korea National Diplomatic Academy, warned there are
"no means to check how much crude oil is delivered through the
pipeline" between China and North Korea.
Koo Kab-Woo
of the University of North Korean Studies in Seoul said the measures carried
symbolic value as the "first US attempt at touching North Korea's economic
lifeline".
How
significant is the textiles ban?
The
resolution bans the import and export of textiles -- both fabric and clothing
-- by the North.
Textiles are one of North Korea's major exports, estimated by Rajiv Biswas of IHS Markit to value $750 million.
![]() |
Textiles
are one of North Korea's major exports, estimated to be worth around
$750
million a year (AFP Photo/KNS)
|
Textiles are one of North Korea's major exports, estimated by Rajiv Biswas of IHS Markit to value $750 million.
Analysts
say the move could cut off a major source of foreign currency for Pyongyang.
China
supplies materials to the North, where they are made into clothing in factories
using cheap labour, and re-exported to China.
Most go to
China and Russia, so the effects will depend on enforcement by Beijing and
Moscow, said Koo.
"It
all depends on China and Russia's willingness."
A UN report
published at the weekend said Pyongyang collected at least $270 million over a
six month-period this year by exporting "almost all of the commodities
prohibited" by existing sanctions.
What about
overseas workers?
The
resolution bars countries from issuing new permits to the roughly 93,000 North
Korean labourers working abroad.
![]() |
Map showing
countries which host North Korean labourers, according to
reports by UN and academics. (AFP Photo/Gal ROMA)
|
Their toil,
mainly at construction sites in Middle Eastern countries as well as Russia and
China, earns revenue for Pyongyang.
There is an
exemption for existing contracts. Analysts are sceptical about any immediate
effects of the ban, but say it could increase pressure on Pyongyang over time.
Will cargo inspections increase?
Under the
measure, countries are authorised to inspect ships suspected of carrying banned
North Korean cargo -- but must first seek the consent of the vessel's flag
state, limiting the impact.
Washington
had sought authorisation for searches by force, which Koo said China and Russia
"strongly opposed".
North Korea
is suspected of engaging in arms trade with countries in Africa and the Middle
East.
The UN
report said it was investigating "chemical, ballistic missile and
conventional arms cooperation" between North Korea and Syria.
UN member
states had interdicted shipments destined for Syria believed to be from the
North's state-owned arms dealer, the Korea Mining and Development Trading Corporation
(KOMID), it said.
![]() |
North Korea
is already under multiple UN sanctions but has still made rapid
progress in its
nuclear and missile programmes (AFP Photo/STR)
|
Will the
sanctions curb Pyongyang's ambitions?
Analysts
say the sanctions were significantly watered down from the initial draft
proposal to get China and Russia on board and are sceptical about whether they
will curb Pyongyang's nuclear ambitions.
North Korea
is already under multiple UN sanctions but has still made rapid progress in its
nuclear and missile programmes.
"It is
not enough to cause pain," said Go Myong-Hyun at the Asan Institute of
Policy Studies.
Instead,
said Koh of Dongguk University, the new sanctions will drive Pyongyang to
accelerate its programmes.
"North
Korea will try to become a nuclear state as quickly as possible to negotiate
with the US as an equal before the effect of the sanctions fully kicks
in," he said.
Pyongyang
habitually attributes UN measures to the "hostile" US, which it
blames for the body's actions.
And Kim
Hyun-Wook of the Korea National Diplomatic Academy, predicted: "The
sanctions will only provide North Korea with an excuse for further
provocations, such as an ICBM launch."





No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.