Yahoo – AFP, Caroline Henshaw, April 14, 2016
Hong Kong (AFP) - Jasmine Li was still a student when she opened her first offshore bank account through Mossack Fonseca Hong Kong, but the shady world she entered that day had been part of the city's underbelly for decades.
![]() |
| The Panama Papers have exposed the key role played by Hong Kong and Singapore in funnelling wealth into tax havens (AFP Photo/Anthony Wallace) |
Hong Kong (AFP) - Jasmine Li was still a student when she opened her first offshore bank account through Mossack Fonseca Hong Kong, but the shady world she entered that day had been part of the city's underbelly for decades.
The
granddaughter of China's then fourth-ranked politician was among dozens named
in a vast cache of documents leaked from the Panama law firm that have given a
glimpse into how the rich and powerful hide their money.
But the
so-called Panama Papers, released by the International Consortium of
Investigative Journalists this month, have also exposed the key role played by
Hong Kong and Singapore in funnelling that wealth into tax havens.
![]() |
More than
16,300 of Panamanian law
firm Mossack Fonseca's active shell
companies were
incorporated through its
Hong Kong and China offices (AFP
Photo/Johannes
Eisele)
|
Experts say
the Asian financial hubs have already channelled billions into tax havens, and
the Boston Consulting Group predicts they will be the world's fastest-growing
offshore centres over the next five years.
"Hong
Kong is set up to make it easy for people to do business, and it is very easy
to do business here," said Douglas Clark, a barrister with one of Hong
Kong's largest chambers.
"But
when it's easy to do business then it's easy to do any type of business, legal
or illegal."
Offshore
companies are not necessarily illegal, but they operate on the fringes of what
is allowed and their opaque structures make it easy to conceal ill-gotten or
politically inconvenient wealth.
They have
proved a boon for Hong Kong and Singapore, which are known not only for their
financial expertise but also light-touch regulation, discretion and non-cooperation
with foreign tax authorities.
Both are
already on regulators' radars -- the EU briefly added Hong Kong to its tax
blacklist last year -- but experts say they are unlikely to do anything to
jeopardise the lucrative offshore business.
'Turning
a blind eye'
Domiciling
offshore has a long history in the region. In 1984, then trading house Jardine,
Matheson & Co, one of the most powerful companies in Hong Kong's colonial
history, relocated to Bermuda citing concerns about the city's handover to
China.
"Hong
Kong's history as a financial centre that specialises in turning a blind eye to
things that would be investigated elsewhere goes right back to the 1960s,"
said financial commentator Tom Holland.
![]() |
A company
name plate is displayed next to the entrance of Mossack
Fonseca & Co. (Asia)
Limited in Hong Kong, China April 5, 2016. Reuters/Bobby Yip
|
Today,
Chinese investors use offshore companies legally in Hong Kong to bypass red
tape, take advantage of tax breaks for foreign investors and circumvent strict
capital controls.
Hong Kong
University law professor Douglas Arner said it has become "perfectly
normal" for companies to park money from overseas operations offshore, as
the city does not tax profits made elsewhere.
But their
widespread use has earned Hong Kong and Singapore reputations for murky
dealings, and the Tax Justice Network ranked them among the least transparent
places in the world in last year's financial secrecy index.
In
Singapore, seen as more rigorous in policing its financial sector, the TJN said
a culture has evolved of enforcing the law domestically but tolerating the
illicit money that flows in from crimes committed overseas.
"Singapore
is not only a secrecy jurisdiction... but also a tax haven, providing numerous
tax avoidance and evasion opportunities," the group said in its profile of
the city state.
'They'll find snakes'
Clark said
criminals, drug dealers, email scammers and corrupt Chinese officials have
turned to Hong Kong to try to hide their money offshore.
But even
when used legally, offshore companies can make it harder to sniff out crime.
Local
shareholder activist David Webb said three-quarters of companies listed in Hong
Kong are incorporated in the Cayman Islands or Bermuda.
![]() |
More than
500 banks, their subsidiaries and branches have worked with Mossack
Fonseca
since the 1970s to help clients manage offshore companies (AFP Photo/
Niklas Halle'n)
|
Webb also
noted that stock exchange rules do not require listed companies to say who owns
any British Virgin Islands companies they make acquisitions from, thereby
fostering fraud and corruption.
"I
don't think there is any appetite in the stock exchange to look under that
particular rock, because they'll find snakes if they do," he said.
"They see tighter regulation as a problem."
An exchange
spokesman said all companies have to comply with the law and exchange rules,
and those incorporated in China and Hong Kong count for more than half of the
exchange's market capitalisation.
Despite the
controversy, few expect authorities in Hong Kong or Singapore to change their
regulations surrounding offshore dealings any time soon given how lucrative the
industry is.
And,
because the cities' own laws haven't been broken, experts say even
international efforts to stop tax cheats are unlikely to make any difference.
"If
anything, this is going to make people even more careful when they set up
offshore holdings," said Clark.
"People
will make sure investments are structured in such a way that if they are ever
revealed, you won't be in trouble."
Hong Kong
authorities said they were aware of the Panama Papers allegations. Singapore's
monetary authority said it was investigating and "will not hesitate to
take firm action" against wrongdoers.
Related Articles:
Why few Americans appear in the Panama Papers
Switzerland, Singapore join clampdown on bank secrecy (Update)
#NEWSGRAPHIC #PanamaPapers highlight Hong Kong's extensive offshore banking connections pic.twitter.com/aftCv6twN1— AFP news agency (@AFP) April 14, 2016
![]() |
The Tax Justice Network's Financial Secrecy Index (AFP Photo/Alain
Bommenel, Jean Michel Cornu)
|
Related Articles:
Why few Americans appear in the Panama Papers
Switzerland, Singapore join clampdown on bank secrecy (Update)





No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.