Want China Times, Xinhua 2015-07-20
The refusal of Japan to express sincere and genuine apology for the atrocities that it has committed during the Second World War has drawn criticism, particularly in the wake of the passage of security bills in Tokyo that would discard Japan's pacifist constitution.
| Chinese veterans gather in font of a monument to commemorate the Second Sino-Japanese War in Gaoyou, Jiangsu province, July 7. (File photo/Xinhua) |
The refusal of Japan to express sincere and genuine apology for the atrocities that it has committed during the Second World War has drawn criticism, particularly in the wake of the passage of security bills in Tokyo that would discard Japan's pacifist constitution.
In an
interview with Xinhua, Jose Cortez, a political analyst, said that 70 years
after the end of the Pacific War, Japan has not fully and unequivocably atoned
for its war crimes and brutalities during its invasion and occupation of Asian
countries, including the Philippines.
Cortez, who
is a consultant of the Media and Communication Research Center (MCRC) of the
Universidad de Manila (University of Manila), said that instead of apologizing,
Japan is now embarking on a new form of adventurism by shedding off its
military's purely self-defense character and expanding it for possible
deployment abroad.
On Thursday
last week, Japan prime minister Shinzo Abe was able to ram through the powerful
lower house of the Japanese Diet some controversial bills that opponents say
will undermine 70 years of pacifism and could see Japanese troops fighting
abroad for the first time since World War II.
According
to Cortez, Japan's security measures would threaten the peace and stability of
the Asia-Pacific region and would prevent full reconciliation between Japan and
its neighbors.
Cortez also
cautioned the Philippine government into signing with Japan a visiting forces
agreement (VFA) that would allow the stationing of Japanese military forces in
the Philippines for joint military exercises similar to the recent joint
Japan-Philippines maritime drill held off the seas of Palawan in southwestern
Philippines.
He said
that what the Philippines should do instead is to scrap the VFA that it signed
with the United States so that "the country's sovereignty and territorial
integrity can fully be safeguarded."
A petition
has been filed at the Philippine Supreme Court calling for a halt to
Philippine-Japan military cooperation. At the lower house of the Philippine
Congress, there are also moves to investigate the Tokyo-Manila military
alliance which has been done through a mere protocol signed by defense
ministers of the two countries and without a formal agreement ratified by the
Philippine Senate.
The
legislation passed in the Diet, which was strongly opposed by a large segment
of the Japanese public, will enable the Japanese military to fight abroad to
protect allies even if there is no direct threat to Japan or its people,
something previous successive governments have ruled out.
Last week,
Beijing urged caution even as it questioned if Japan was "going to give up
its exclusively defense-oriented policy. " "We solemnly urge the
Japanese side to... refrain from jeopardizing China's sovereignty and security
interests or crippling regional peace and stability," China's Foreign
Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said in a statement.
China has
frequently warned of the dangers of an unfettered Japan, invoking its
destructive invasions and occupations in the first half of the 20th century.
In his book
entitled "War, Guild and Politics after World War II," author Thomas
U. Berger explained why Japan is viewed as so unrepentant despite the
atrocities committed by the Japanese Imperial forces in China during the
country's half-century of war and colonial expansion that ended in 1945.
Berger said
that a complex web of culture, politics, geography and shifting notions of
justice have made it more difficult for the Japanese to apologize for past
transgressions than other societies. "That's particularly true compared to
Germany, whose crimes outstripped even those of Japan, but which has largely
reconciled with former victims, "he said.
Berger, who
is an associate professor of international relations at Boston University and a
frequent traveler to Japan, said "If we have a look at the list of war
apology statements from Japan it could appear that Japan has indeed apologized
many times for its WW-II atrocities. "However, a better look reveals that
Japan has mostly apologized to South Korea and Southeast Asian countries, but
no proper official apology was issued to China,"he said.
According
to Berger, among the 35 war-apology-related quotes by Japan, almost all of them
were addressed to South Korea, a few are not directed at any particular
country, and very few are addressed to China. "In fact, I only found
mentions of China in speeches, and none of them have for main purpose to give a
genuine apology, mentioning the massacres, rapes, plunder, sexual slavery and
biological experiment on live humans. The emperor has never apologized
to China," Berger said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.