Burma’s
opposition leader appears to be cowed by her need to dampen ethnic tensions and
win votes from an electorate in the thrall of Islamophobia
The Guardian, Sara Perria, Tuesday 19 May 2015
![]() |
| A Rohingya boy who recently arrived in Indonesia holds a ball adorned in international flags at a shelter in Kuala Langsa. Photograph: Beawiharta/Reuters |
When
thousands of Rohingya people from Burma were discovered floating in boats on
the south-east Asian seas much of the world was understandably gripped by this
unfolding human tragedy.
Voices of
anger were raised; something had to be done to end the suffering, to help those
men, women and children in need.
But what
has surprised some is the silence of the Nobel peace prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi.
After all,
these are the poverty-stricken and disenfranchised refugees from her own
country who are now the focus of greater attention than ever before.
The
contrast could not be more striking: how could such an iconic figure of human
rights be so reticent when it comes to defending an ethnic minority from her
own country?
It was only
at the urging of reporters on Monday that a spokesman for her opposition party,
the National League for Democracy (NLD), addressed the issue.
He said the
Rohingya people should be entitled to human rights, while urging a solution
that acknowledged their right to citizenship status.
But nothing
has come directly from the party’s leader. Aung San Suu Kyi herself has
previously justified her reluctance to speak out on the issue of the Rohingya,
even when pressed to do so during Buddhist-Muslim clashes that swept through
the country in 2013.
She feared
that any statement she made would only fuel tensions between the Buddhist
majority and the Rohingya, who make up about a third of the population of
Rakhine state, which borders Bangladesh.
Now, a
surge of Buddhist nationalism and the complex ethnic political ramifications
for a country that has just started a transition to democracy are taking their
toll on her international image.
In the
courtyard of a Buddhist monastery in the ancient Rakhine capital of Mrauk-U,
the difficulties faced by the opposition leader known as “the Lady” are
illustrated by a senior monk who repeats what he says are the warnings of Ashin Wirathu, an influential monk based in Mandalay who has become a leading voice
of a new generation of nationalists espousing the cause of the Bamar, the
dominant ethnic group in Burma.
“They will
come with swords, they will kill us,” the senior monk says of the Muslim
“hordes” he sees encroaching on Burma.
Muslims
reproduce like rabbits, they want to kill us with swords, they want to conquer
us
“Muslims
reproduce like rabbits; they want to kill us with swords; they want to conquer
us – we have to defend ourselves and our religion,” he insists, explicitly
identifying the Rohingya with Islamist terrorism around the world.
Extremist
movements such as 969, which is driven by Ashin Wirathu, and Ma Ba Tha – the
Organisation for the Protection of Race and Religion – present themselves as
defenders of the country’s interests and its Bamar soul against foreign
influence in post-sanctions Burma.
While
insisting that he is against violence, Ashin Wirathu and those like him have
fuelled and exploited tensions between Buddhists and Muslims in Rakhine state,
promoting the belief that Islam is penetrating the country to install sharia law
and leave Buddhists as a minority.
The
nationalists are also trying to smear Aung San Suu Kyi by depicting her as “the
Muslim lover”.
In a
country that is 90% Buddhist there is little sympathy to be found for the
Rohingya cause, and expressing support could be political suicide for both the
NLD and the military-backed ruling party less than six months before
parliamentary elections.
A party
source close to Aung San Suu Kyi, who asked not to be named, said the party
leader was deeply upset over what was happening. But the source said she also
understood the penalty for being seen as favouring Muslims and believed she
needed to be in government to deal with the backlash.
There is a
strong belief that powerful people with close links to radical monks are deliberately
stirring up tensions between communities in an attempt to disrupt ongoing
political reforms.
According
to some observers, Aung San Suu Kyi and her strategists have decided that
speaking up for the Rohingya may not be in their electoral interests.
“Aung San
Suu Kyi and her strategists are looking at the electoral maths,” says Nicholas
Farrelly, director of the Australian National University’s Myanmar Research
Centre.
“They have
long imagined that any perception the NLD is too cosy with the country’s
Muslims could lose them millions of votes. That, at least, is the fear.
“They are
anxious that the Rohingya could serve as a wedge between Aung San Suu Kyi and
tens of millions of Buddhists that she is counting on for votes. It doesn’t
help that many NLD members probably support harsh treatment for the Rohingya
and feel no special compassion for them.”
Burma’s
quasi-civilian government, which is headed by former generals, is in a similar
situation. President Thein Sein’s success in bringing the country back into the
international fold after decades of isolation is threatened by foreign coverage
of the Rohingya boat crisis.
For days
the government line was to resist diplomatic pressure and insist the root cause
of the crisis was trafficking of migrants, not the persecution of a stateless
people whose name, Rohingya, is not even officially recognised.
But on
Tuesday the official newspaper, Global New Light of Myanmar, reported on the
crisis for the first time, in a further sign that the government is moderating
its rejectionist position. The daily quoted the information minister, Ye Htut,
as telling foreign ambassadors that Burma would cooperate with regional and
international counterparts “to tackle the ongoing boat people crisis, which is
a consequence of human trafficking of people from Rakhine state and Bangladesh
to Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia.
“The
Myanmar [Burmese] government will scrutinise the boat people and bring back
those who can show evidence of citizenship,” the minister said.
The
government’s move to at least acknowledge the problem in public could make it
easier for the NLD to follow suit and promote a united response.
On the
other hand, Aung San Suu Kyi might decide to maintain her silence, calculating
it is in her interests to leave the government on its own to deal with any
backlash across the country but especially in Rakhine as the elections draw
near.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.