As relief
teams struggle to reach remote villages in quake-hit Nepal, anger and
frustration at the slow pace of aid delivery are growing in the Himalayan
nation, with some using the discontent to score political points.
Deutsche Welle, 4 May 2015
"The
government's response was late, so that created a vacuum while delivering
immediate aid. After learning that remote villages had received no government
assistance for days, people in Nepal started to get increasingly angry."
These are
words of journalist and Kathmandu-resident Shiwani Neupane speaking to DW about
the reasons behind the growing public discontent in Nepal over the government's
handling of relief efforts some 10 days after a 7.8-magnitude earthquake struck
an area between the densely populated Nepal's capital, Kathmandu, and the city
of Pokhar on April 25.
The massive
quake - the worst to hit the landlocked South Asian nation in more than 80
years - killed more than 7,200 people and wounded over 14,300, according to
government figures. The death toll is likely to jump once relief teams reach
mountain villages flattened near the epicenter.
The UN
estimates eight million people - nearly a third of Nepal's population - may
have been affected by the earthquake across 39 of the country's 75 districts,
with at least 2 million people needing tents, water, food and medicines over
the next three months.
 |
| The earthquake was the worst to hit Nepal in more than 80 years |
"We
are still having problems getting things to people in very remote areas,"
Orla Fagan, a spokeswoman for the UN Office for the Coordination of
Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), told DW. "There is no physical land access to
these areas in most cases and we are therefore looking at a wider array of
alternative ways to get supplies to people in the most remote areas."
Many
mountain roads remain blocked by landslides so helicopters and aircraft are
particularly needed to reach those in remote mountain villages. In this
context, the UN welcomed the fact that a US Air Force C-17 aircraft and four
tilt-rotor Ospreys landed in Kathmandu.
"They
offer us the opportunity to drop off aid relief at pre-determined points. We
know there currently are 14 highly-affected districts facing these
limitations," Fagan said, adding that she hopes aid can reach all areas
before the end of the week.
Growing
frustration
In the
meantime, homeless and bereaved survivors of the disaster are growing
increasingly angry and frustrated over the pace of the rescue. They accuse the
government of being too slow to distribute international aid that has flooded
into the country and of leaving them stranded in remote areas waiting in
desperate need of temporary shelters against the rain and cold.
"Fear
and anger is also being directed towards the government due to perceived
corruption in the distribution of aid," said journalist Neupane.
Last week,
over 200 Nepalis protested outside parliament in Kathmandu, demanding the
government increase the number of buses going to the interior hills and improve
distribution of aid.
According
to George Varughese, Nepal country representative for The Asia Foundation, this
level of anger is justified from the victims' perspective for a number of
reasons. "Many have seen or heard their loved ones die for want of timely
rescue and treatment. Others remain hungry in far-flung areas and are at risk.
Information is simply not flowing to and from affected areas," Varughese
told DW.
The
Kathmandu resident argues the government is being viewed as unhelpful because
of its tendency to issue bureaucratic edicts about who may help and how- in the
name of coordination and transparency - rather than being viewed as a kinetic
facilitator and force multiplier of all relief providers.
"We
are seeing that the Nepali government has a couple of bottlenecks in terms of
delivering aid. They have neither a useful fast-track system for importing
relief materials nor a useful system for receiving and warehousing relief
materials," he told DW. As a result, relief materials are piled up in
transit airports or border crossings.
Distribution
problems
In fact,
Nepal recently faced criticism for holding up foreign relief deliveries at
customs, with reports of aid trucks being turned away at the border with India
because they did not have the correct documentation. Then there are problems in
terms of distributing relief materials once they are in the country. In most
remote areas, only helicopters are effective and Nepal has very few of them.
But in
order to fully comprehend the government's ability to respond, one also needs
to take into account the country's political and economic situation. With a
total annual GDP of $20 billion last year, and an annual per capita GDP of only
$1,000, Nepal has an extremely limited capacity to fund disaster relief and
long-term reconstruction efforts.
And then
there is the issue of political instability which has affected the country in
recent years. In 2008, more than a decade after it started, a communist
insurgency led to the overthrow of the monarchy. Since then, the nation has
faced a political paralysis as the main political parties have failed to agree
on a constitution, triggering civil unrest across the country and affecting
Nepal's disaster preparedness.
 |
| Nepal has very few helicopters to distribute relief materials |
"In 2008,
Nepal finalized its National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management, but the
fractured political situation since then has prevented substantial progress
towards implementation of, for example, more rigorous governance of building
practices or wide-spread public awareness activities," Alison Evans,
senior Asia Analyst at IHS.
'A matter
of great shame'
Nevertheless,
given the growing level of public discontent, opposition parties appear keen on
capitalizing on the crisis by attacking the government of Prime Minister Sushil
Koirala. Last week, Dinanath Sharma, a spokesman for Nepal's Maoists, was
quoted by the Wall Street Journal as saying that Koirala had acted too slowly
and was "showing an insensitive attitude at this time of great national
loss."
Sharma
added that the fact that Nepal was relying on relief assistance from India,
China, the US and other countries instead of being able to take care of itself
"is a matter of great shame."
Siegfried
O. Wolf, a director of research at Brussels-based South Asia Democratic Forum
(SADF), believes that given the magnitude of the disaster and the slow pace of
the government-led relief efforts, there is a chance that the Maoists could
capitalize on the crisis and stage a major comeback, at least politically.
"We
should keep in mind that the epicenter of the recent earthquake was in the
country's northwest, not too far from the capital Kathmandu - an area in which
the Maoist movement has enjoyed a significant support base for the past two
decades. In this context, it is worrisome that this part of Nepal still feels
neglected by the central government," Wolf told DW.
Political
implications
However,
Varughese points out that the opposition parties have been equally sluggish to
respond to the disaster and that it took them a full eight days after the quake
to approach donors and international NGO's for funds to conduct their own
relief operations.
 |
| The quake caused widespread destruction affecting about eight million people, the UN says |
So what
political impact will the quake devastation have? As Varughese explains, it is
hard to tell because none of the political parties have credible claim to being
more effective at governance; so instead of the toppling of the current coalition,
we can imagine a national unity government emerging to handle the relief
efforts, with the UCPN (Maoist) and Madhesi parties joining the government.
Journalist
Neupane, however, believes this is unlikely to happen in the coming months
given the current strong public distrust directed at all political parties.
This may also further delay the constitution-drafting process, she underlined.
"But if the parties understand the sentiment of Nepali people at all, they
may try and re-build their image. This is actually a very good time for them to
do so."
Analyst
Evans also points out that continued failure to agree on a new constitution
would only prolong the country's political deadlock, which is "likely to
hinder efforts to swiftly and effectively respond to this current disaster as
well as efforts to enact policies in the next few years that would limit
similarly widespread loss of life in the future."
Related Articles:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.