At a summit
in Indonesia, leaders of Asia and Africa have pledged to cooperate more closely
and called for a financial world order more open to their emerging economies.
But is this a relationship between equal partners?
Deutsche Welle, 23 April 2015
![]() |
| Indonesian President Joko Widodo addresses the opening of the Asian-African Summit in Jakarta, capital of Indonesia, on April 22, 2015 |
"The
view which says that global economic problems can only be solved by the World
Bank, the IMF, the ADB, is an obsolete view that needs discarding," Joko
Widodo told delegates on April 22 at the start of this year's Asia-Africa
summit in Jakarta to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the gathering between
leaders from both regions. "There needs to be change," Jokowi said,
adding it was imperative that "we build a new international economic order
that is open to new emerging economic powers."
A similar
comment was made by Chinese President Xi Jinping, who said that "a new
type of international relations" was needed to encourage cooperation
between Asian and African nations, according to China's state-run news agency
Xinhua.
While no
mention was made of the new China-led financial institutions such as the BRICS
New Development Bank (NDB), the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), and
the Silk Road Fund, analysts agree that both Asia and Africa want a reform of
the international financial architecture to reduce their reliance on the
Bretton Woods multilateral financial institutions.
Created by
the United States and Europe after World War II, the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) and the World Bank have been at the centre of the post-World War II
monetary order. The Asian Development Bank or ADB is viewed by some as
dominated by Japan.
![]() |
| Japanese PM Shinzo Abe and Chinese President Xi Jinping met on the summit sidelines |
In this
context, Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe said in the conference that
"African and Asian countries are a formidable force... yet that numerical
strength counts for little when it comes to the running and control of the
multilateral system."
A new
model?
While the
China-led initiatives have been criticized by some as a way for Beijing to
challenge Western-backed institutions, there are others who believe these new
development banks may have a positive impact on emerging economies.
In fact,
more than 40 countries have already announced their intention to join the AIIB
- set to be launched by the end of 2015 - as founding members, including some
of Europe's largest economies, with the US and Japan being notable absentees.
"While
the IMF, World Bank, and ADB have a vital role to play, they cannot meet the
needs of the 21st century global economy by themselves, especially in light of
the refusal of the US Congress to allow China and others a greater voice in
them," Gregory Poling, a Southeast Asia expert at the Center for Strategic
& International Studies (CSIS) told DW.
At the same
time, the statements made by Asian and African leaders at the two-day
conference highlight just how much the relationship between the two regions has
changed since 1955, when the first Asia-Africa Summit took place in the city of
Bandung on Java island. At the time, several of the 30 participating countries
had just gained independence from colonial rule and were seeking to forge a
common identity. And other colonies were trying to rally international support
to obtain independence.
From
independence to investment
Six decades
later, however, priorities have changed. First of all, there is no longer a
Cold War and therefore no longer a Third World to which Asian and African
non-aligned states belong – an aspect which fundamentally changed the politics
of the states involved in this year's summit. But perhaps most importantly, the
summit has become a key as a platform for diplomacy and boosting ties among
participating states, as the meeting between the leaders of Japan and China on
the sidelines of this year's summit shows.
"The
Asia-Africa Summit has become a major chance for Asian leaders to send a
message that we now live in a multi-polar world, in which Asia's political and
economic clout must be seen as at least as important as that of the US and
Europe," Poling told DW.
Some of the
summit participants are even G-20 members such as Indonesia, China, India and
South Africa. This is perhaps also a reason why Indonesian President Widodo has
touted the forum as the place to realize the Bandung spirit by lowering trade
barriers and thus strengthening trade and investment cooperation.
Analyst
Poling is of the view that "whereas 1955 was an American- and
European-driven global economy, 2015 is a world driven economically by Asia,
with African states themselves of growing economic importance."While
participating states made up only a quarter of the world economic output 60
years ago, they are now responsible for more than half of global GDP."
Strengthening
ties
In light of
this development, Rajiv Biswas, Asia-Pacific Chief Economist at IHS, a global
analytics firm, argues that the current focus of the Africa-Asia relationship
is more about economic and investment ties. In fact, the analyst points out
that trade ties between Asia and Africa have been completely transformed since
1955, notably led by China's economic ascendancy to become the world's second
largest economy.
"The
rise of China as an industrial power has generated tremendous growth in demand
for imports of commodities, and Africa has become an increasingly important
source," he told DW.
According
to IHS, bilateral trade between China and Africa has increased from $12 billion
in 1955 to $200 billion by 2014. China's bilateral trade with Africa is far
greater than that of Asia's second largest economy, Japan, which is in the
order of $30 billion.
India has
strong trade ties with Africa, with bilateral trade between having reached $70
billion in 2014, according to IHS. Indonesia's bilateral trade with Africa has
reached $11 billion. However, most investment flow in one direction – from Asia
to Africa, a fact that highlights the nature of Asian-African ties for the time
being.
Equal
partners?
Although
the math suggests that development gap between Asia and Africa will narrow as
the century progresses, Asia clearly has a greater weight today than does
Africa - a fact which is reflected to a large extent in the size and structure
of their respective economies.
![]() |
| 'There needs to be change,' Indonesian President Jokowi said during the conference |
Moreover,
Asia's trade with Africa generally reflects the comparative advantage of each
region, with Asia being the factory of the world for manufactures, and Africa
being a major exporter of agricultural and mineral commodities, as economist
Biswas pointed out.
"These
strengths are reflected in the composition of bilateral trade, with Asian
exports to Africa dominated by manufactures, while African exports to Asia are
dominated by mineral and agricultural commodities. Also Asia is a major source
of private sector investment as well as government development finance, so
Asian countries such as China and Japan tend to be large sources of investment
flows into African countries," he said.
But while
Asia expands its relations to other parts of the world on an institutional
level – such as the Asia-Europe-Meeting (ASEM) or the Forum for East Asia-Latin
America Cooperation (FEALAC) - there are few such institutions in place between
Asia and Africa.
Ten years
ago, on the 50th anniversary of the Bandung conference, leaders from both
regions agreed to forge a "new Asian-African strategic partnership."
However, this has only resulted in technical cooperation, exchange programs and
non-binding economic forum. This year the summit participants emphasized what
they have in common, but it seems that the differences between the two regions
are bigger than 60 years ago.
Related Articles:
Jokowi Calls for Reform of UN at Asian-African Conference
Jokowi Says Colonization of Palestine Must End Immediately
Jokowi Says Colonization of Palestine Must End Immediately




No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.