South
Korean media has said that high-ranking military officials from both sides of
the border have met for secret talks. Their last face-to-face meeting was in
2007.
Deutsche Welle, 15 Oct 2014
Recent
altercations along the North and South Korean border prompted a meeting between
the nation's military officials on Wednesday, according to reports circulating
through the South Korean media.
South
Korea's defense ministry declined to comment on the news.
Last week,
the neighboring countries traded fire twice. The first incident occurred when a
North Korean navy vessel sailed into southern territory in the Yellow Sea near
the island of Yeonpyeong.
The second
exchange of fire was reported on Friday. Activists from the South had launched
balloons carrying tens of thousands of leaflets denouncing the dictatorship in
Pyongyang. Northern forces shot at the South first, which then retaliated with
rifle fire.
There were
no reports of causalities from either incident.
South
Korean news agency Yonhap reported on Wednesday that the military officials had
held their secret meeting in the border truce village of Panmunjom (pictured).
Tensions
have remained high over the past year between Pyongyang and Seoul in light of
repeated threats of attack by northern dictator Kim Jong Un and the nearly
six-month closure of the joint industrial park Kaesong.
However,
relations appeared to be improving earlier this month when North Korean
officials agreed to resume high-level dialogue with Seoul during a surprise
visit to their southern neighbor.
Meanwhile,
speculation surrounding the young North Korean dictator's grip on power
continued to provide fodder for the rumor mills this week. Kim Jong Un
disappeared from the public eye on September 3 - believed to be due to ill
health - only to reemerge suddenly in North Korean media reports on Tuesday.
However,
the state news agency published photos, but no video, raising further questions
about the dictator's health.
While the
Korean War ended over half a century ago, the neighboring countries technically
remain at war because they signed an armistice, not a peace treaty.
kms/rc (AP, Reuters)

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.