Want China Times, Xinhua 2014-09-04
Fines of more than 110 million yuan (US$17.8 million) have been imposed on 23 property insurers and one insurance association in east China's Zhejiang province after evidence of price monopolies was found.
| A nurse talks a patient through her insurance application at a hospital in Lanzhou, Gansu province, April 9. (File photo/Xinhua) |
Fines of more than 110 million yuan (US$17.8 million) have been imposed on 23 property insurers and one insurance association in east China's Zhejiang province after evidence of price monopolies was found.
The
Zhejiang Provincial Insurance Association and 23 property insurance companies
were found to have colluded on discounts on car insurance premiums during
multiple meetings, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) said
on Tuesday.
The
penalties against domestic insurance companies were the latest measures in
China's anti-monopoly crackdown. Foreign carmakers and auto parts suppliers
have also been fined for monopoly activities since the end of July.
The NDRC,
China's top price antitrust agency, said it began its investigation into all 32
insurance companies in Zhejiang after it was tipped off that the association
convened with 23 insurance companies to collude on discounts for premiums on
newly purchased cars.
They also
decided on a uniform commission fee for car insurance sales based on market
share, according to the NDRC.
The 23
insurance companies violated the Anti-Monopoly Law, which prohibits competing
market players from reaching monopoly agreements to fix or change the price of
a good or service.
As the
organizer and planner of the price monopoly, the insurance association was
given the maximum fine of 500,000 yuan (US$81,500), while property insurance
companies were fined a total of 110.2 million yuan (US$18 million), or one
percent of their revenues from commercial vehicle insurance last year.
Among the
punished companies, the Zhejiang branch of CPIC Property Insurance was fined
20.7 million yuan (US$3.4 million), while the Zhejiang units of Pingan Property
Insurance and China United Property Insurance were fined 15.99 million yuan
(US$2.60 million) and 10.29 million yuan (US$1.67 million), respectively.
PICC
Property and Casualty was exempt from the fines as it was the first company to
turn itself in to the NDRC and submitted a report on the key evidence it had
reached with other insurance companies
Meanwhile,
anti-monopoly investigations into the Zhejiang branches of nine other insurers,
including US Liberty Insurance and Japanese Aioi Nissay Dowa Insurance (China)
Company Limited, have been suspended as they did not participate in the
monopoly agreement, according to NDRC.
China has
stepped up its law enforcement against monopolies over the past two months, but
an NDRC spokesman acknowledged that it would be unlikely for antitrust
departments to launch an anti-monopoly investigation into every industry due to
personnel shortage.
"Currently,
most monopoly cases handled by the NDRC stemmed mainly from
whistle-blowing," the spokesman said.
According
to the NDRC, horizontal monopoly agreements between competing companies are
quite difficult to spot or investigate when compared with vertical agreements
involving a company and its downstream dealers.
The latest
punishment followed a series of anti-monopoly investigations by China into top
global brands such as Microsoft, Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz in the past two
months.
The State
Administration for Industry and Commerce on Monday gave Microsoft Corp. a
20-day deadline to explain compatibility and bundling issues with its Windows
and Office software in its antitrust probe.
The NDRC
spokesman noted that China'a anti-monopoly law treats all enterprises equally,
be it a domestic enterprise or foreign firm.
Until the
most recent cases, the NDRC itself has launched similar investigations into
domestic and overseas LCD manufacturers, milk formula makers, pharmaceutical
factories and liquor makers.
Last month,
the NDRC handed down total fines of 1.24 billion yuan (US$202.1 million) to 12
Japanese auto parts suppliers over price monopoly.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.