Jakarta Globe, Kristy Siegfried, Apr 28, 2014
Makassar. When Mohammed and Minara Ali ran from their burning home in Sittwe, capital of Myanmar’s Rakhine State, nearly two years ago, they had no idea where they were going or how they would get there.
Makassar. When Mohammed and Minara Ali ran from their burning home in Sittwe, capital of Myanmar’s Rakhine State, nearly two years ago, they had no idea where they were going or how they would get there.
“To save
our lives, we ran away,” said Mohammed. “The military were shooting at us; my
father was killed by the shooting and until now, I don’t know what happened to
my two younger brothers.”
Mohammed,
35, and his wife, Minara, 26, are Rohingya — an ethnic, Muslim minority group
who have faced decades of persecution and discrimination in Myanmar. Myanmar
law does not recognize them as citizens, hampering their access to health care,
education and employment.
The Alis
joined thousands of Rohingya who were fleeing riots that had erupted between
the majority Rakhine Buddhist population and local Rohingya residents in June
2012. They boarded a crowded boat and used Minara’s wedding ring to pay for
their passage.
After many
days at sea, they reached Malaysia where Mohammed found work laboring in paddy
fields. However, local police regularly stopped him and confiscated his meager
salary and after six months during which the Alis’ asylum application remained
undecided, survival had become almost impossible. They decided to sell what was
left of Minara’s wedding jewelry to pay a smuggler to organize their passage to
Australia from Indonesia.
“After two
days, the [boat’s] engine broke down and we were floating at sea for three
days,” recalled Mohammed. “Then we came to an island, but there was no food
there, only monkeys, so someone phoned the police to come and rescue us.”
They spent
the next year in detention in Jakarta — five months in separate cells at the
city’s immigration headquarters and the remaining time at an immigration
detention center where they were able to apply for asylum.
“We
suffered a lot in detention,” said Mohammed. “There were many mosquitoes and it
was dirty and, in the first place, we weren’t allowed to talk to UNHCR [the UN
Refugee Agency] or IOM [International Organization for Migration].”
After being
granted refugee status two months ago, they were moved to accommodation managed
by IOM in Makassar, a bustling city on the southwest coast of Sulawesi. IOM
also provides them with a small monthly stipend to buy food and basic
necessities.
“We’re free
here, but we always have tension, thinking about my mother and other siblings
[in Myanmar],” said Mohammed. “From here, we can’t assist them.”
Barred from
working
Refugees
are barred from working in Indonesia and even if they had any jewelry left to
sell to pay a smuggler, “there’s no way now to go to Australia by boat,” said
Abdul Ghani, 23, another Rohingya refugee staying in the same building in
Makassar.
Over the
last six months, Australia’s military-led operation to prevent boats carrying
asylum seekers from reaching its shores has been extremely effective, even if
its practice of towing boats already in Australian waters back towards
Indonesia has been criticized by UNHCR as in breach of the Refugee Convention.
Smugglers and their clients have now largely abandoned attempts to reach
Australia by sea.
Mohammed
and Minara Ali are Rohingya refugees from Myanmar’s Rakhine State. After a
failed to attempt to reach Australia by boat, they spent a year in detention in
Jakarta. (Photo courtesy of IRIN/Kristy Siegfried)
The Alis
spend their days waiting for UNHCR to come with “good news.” Good news would
mean resettlement to a country where they could live without fear and earn a
living, but their wait is likely to be a long one.
For
refugees living in desperate circumstances around the world, resettlement is
often the hope that sustains them. However, for the vast majority, it remains a
distant hope with less than 1 in 10 of the 700,000 refugees globally that UNHCR
estimates to be in need of resettlement departing for resettlement countries in
an average year.
For
refugees in Indonesia, the odds are slightly better with nearly 900 refugees
out of about 3,300 who were eligible departing for resettlement in 2013.
However, none of them were Rohingya refugees from Myanmar.
“Why is it
that other nationalities get resettlement and not Rohingya? This is my very
important question,” said Ghani. Other Rohingya refugees that IRIN interviewed
in Makassar repeated the same question.
According
to UNHCR, refugees from Myanmar have been major beneficiaries of resettlement
programs in recent years. In 2012, they accounted for 22,000 of the nearly
75,000 cases that UNHCR submitted to resettlement countries for consideration.
How many of those (refugees from Myanmar) were Rohingya is not recorded but a
large number were non-Rohingya refugees living in camps along the Thai-Myanmar
border who were resettled to the United States through a group resettlement
program which ended in early 2014.
Malaysia
versus Indonesia
In the last
year, over 1,000 asylum seekers from Myanmar have arrived in Indonesia.
Anecdotal reports suggest the vast majority are Rohingya who, like the Alis,
tired of waiting for refugee status in neighboring Malaysia which is host to
over 100,000 refugees and asylum seekers from Myanmar.
Neither
country is a signatory to the Refugee Convention, but refugee status
determination by UNHCR is generally quicker in Indonesia and more care and
support programs for refugees are available, most of them provided by IOM with
funding from the Australian government.
Although
there are more informal work opportunities for refugees and asylum seekers in
Malaysia, Ghani opted to come to Indonesia after five years working in
restaurants and factories there while waiting for his asylum application to be
processed.
“In
Malaysia I got money, but not enough for me, for my future, because I had no
identity, no documents,” he told IRIN. “I applied for refugee status there, but
after such a long time I gave up.”
Call for
regional response
In an e-mailed
response to questions from IRIN, Vivian Tan, a regional spokeswoman for UNHCR
based in Bangkok, wrote: “Partly because of the limited scope of resettlement,
we have to be very careful not to create false expectations or a ‘pull factor’
through resettlement.”
However,
Steve Hamilton, deputy chief of mission for IOM in Indonesia said there was a
need for UNHCR to provide greater public clarity concerning the current lack of
resettlement of Rohingya refugees from Indonesia so that “other Rohingya don’t
get false hopes and make the journey to Indonesia thinking they will be
resettled.”
Tan
acknowledged that continued tensions in Rakhine State preclude the option of
voluntary repatriation for Rohingya refugees and that “there is no prospect for
local integration in their host countries.”
“UNHCR has
been advocating with host governments for temporary protection for them … and
access to basic services such as shelter, food, health care and education.
Where possible, we are also urging governments to grant them the right to legal
work so that they can support themselves while waiting for other options to
open up,” she added.
Sarnata
Reynolds, a senior human rights adviser at Refugees International, pointed out
that “resettlement has to be used carefully” to avoid playing into the Myanmar
government’s “policy of exclusion” of the Rohingya. However, she disputed the
suggestion that it could act as a pull factor. “Conditions in Myanmar [for the
Rohingya] are so bad that they can’t survive there,” she told IRIN over the
phone from Washington DC.
“I think
over time there will have to be a regional response that’s more orchestrated and
takes into account the fact that they’re not going anywhere,” she added.
Ghani is
well aware that his future is likely to remain on hold for some time to come.
“I can’t make a plan, I can only hope for a better life through resettlement,”
he said. “UNHCR told me only to wait and I’m not considering going to back to
Malaysia, but I don’t know how long I can wait. I’m always thinking
about my family.”


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.