Google – AFP, Jonathan Fowler (AFP), 15 October 2013
Geneva —
Iran on Tuesday laid out a hotly-awaited proposal to break the deadlock in
talks with world powers over its nuclear programme, diplomats said, in a test
of a thaw under new President Hassan Rouhani.
The
hour-long PowerPoint presentation by Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and
his negotiators was for the first time delivered in English, officials said,
underlining a new mood in the often-tense nuclear talks.
Iran's
archfoe Israel has warned the world not to fall for "sweet talk" from
Rouhani but Western negotiators insisted they were not naive.
![]() |
Graphic on
Iran's nuclear facilities as World powers
meet for fresh talks on Iran's
nuclear programme in
Geneva on Tuesday (AFP)
|
On the eve
of the two-day meeting, Zarif said the plan contained three steps that could
settle the long-running nuclear standoff "within a year", but did not
elaborate.
Zarif,
travelling with his personal doctor as he battles back pain, has said he hopes
the talks will sketch out a "roadmap" for higher-level negotiations.
He said the
initial step could be achieved "within a month, or two, or even
less".
Iran
meeting with the European Union-chaired P5+1 group -- the United States,
Britain, France, China and Russia, plus Germany -- ends a six-month hiatus over
the Islamic republic's refusal to curb uranium enrichment in exchange for
easing punishing international sanctions.
It also
marks a revival of talks put on ice in the closing months of the presidency of
conservative Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Rouhani,
who took office in August, has promised transparency on the nuclear programme
and engagement to eventually lift the trade embargo that is strangling Iran's
economy by hitting oil exports and access to global banking.
EU
spokesman Michael Mann underlined the "very different" atmosphere
under Zarif's team.
"We
have come here with a sense of cautious optimism and a great sense of
determination because we believe it's really time now for tangible
results," he told reporters in Geneva.
"There
are signals from Tehran that they want to engage in these negotiations, that
they want to be more transparent. The proof would be if they made real
progress," he said.
"We
are on our side ambitious to move forward quickly... The ball remains in their
court," he added.
A senior US
administration official said in Geneva that detail was the key and that any
easing of sanctions would be "targeted, proportional to what Iran puts on
the table."
"We
are quite ready to move. But it depends what they put on the table... We are
hopeful, but that has to be tested with concrete, verifiable actions."
"In
the past, Iran has taken the negotiated time and just kept moving forward with
its nuclear programme. We cannot allow that to be the case," the official
warned.
Zarif
admitted to difficulties in the negotiations, on hold since a round in April in
Kazakhstan under Ahmadinejad's team.
"The
nuclear issue cannot be resolved in one session, as mistrust has been
accumulated over years," he said.
"I am
not pessimistic about the talks, but we need to see the good intentions and
political will of the other side in action," he said.
Western powers
and Israel suspect Iran is trying to develop an atomic bomb, a claim vehemently
denied by Tehran which insists its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes.
![]() |
A handout
picture released by the Iranian
presidency shows President Hassan
Rouhani
waving at Tehran University on
October,14 2013 (Iran's Presidency Office
Website/AFP)
|
A first
meeting between Zarif and his counterparts from the six powers took place last
month on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, accompanied by a landmark
two-way meeting with US Secretary of State John Kerry.
After
meeting Ashton in London on Sunday, Kerry said the window for diplomacy with
Iran was "cracking open."
Shortly
before the talks began, Israel -- believed to be the Middle East's only nuclear
armed state -- warned against accepting "cosmetic concessions" that
would not impede a quest for atomic weapons.
Kerry
underlined Sunday that Washington meant what it said about never allowing room
for a nuclear-armed Iran.
"I
believe firmly that no deal is better than a bad deal," he said.
Related Article:





No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.