Jakarta Globe – AFP, August 12, 2013
![]() |
| Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd speaks at the National Press Club in Canberra during a debate with conservative opposition leader Tony Abbott on August 11, 2013. (AFP Photo/Andrew Meares) |
Australian
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said on Monday it was time to end the “acrimonious”
debate on same-sex marriage, after he vowed to introduce a bill legalizing the
unions if returned to office.
If
re-elected on Sept. 7, Rudd said Labor would introduce a bill within 100 days,
becoming the first Australian leader to promise to support marriage equality.
“Frankly,
in 2013, I think the time has come to put this acrimonious debate behind us,”
the leader, who has previously been against gay marriage, told reporters on
Monday.
Rudd, who
is trailing conservative opposition leader Tony Abbott in opinion polls, said
it was a reform millions of Australians had waited a long time to see become
law.
“I’ve been
thinking about the meaning of marriage for a long time — and I won’t hide the
fact that this has been a journey for me,” he said.
“But here
is what I know: we are at our best when we give all Australians the same
dignity, the same opportunity for happiness.
“I believe
that no matter who we love, we all should be able to make that same promise I
was able to make to Therese over 30 years ago. That all of us should be allowed
to marry the one we love,” he added, referring to his wife Therese Rein.
Rudd
initially promised to introduce the bill during the first leaders’ debate of
the election campaign on Sunday night.
Although
his ruling Labor Party formally changed its position on the issue in December
2011 to a pro-gay marriage stance, Rudd and his predecessor Julia Gillard have
both historically been against the reform.
A one-sided
conscience vote last September was defeated 98 votes to 42 after Abbott refused
to allow opposition MPs to break with party lines, rendering it a null
prospect.
Both
Gillard and Rudd voted no in the September ballot but Rudd, a Christian, has
since changed his position.
He urged
Abbott to allow politicians on his side to also be allowed a conscience vote so
any legislation could be supported by parliamentarians from both major parties.
But the
conservative leader of a Liberal Party and National Party coalition said that while
he knew the subject was “passionately important” to many Australians, including
his openly-lesbian sister Christine Forster, it was not a crucial election
issue.
“I’ve got
to say that as far as an incoming Coalition government is concerned, the priority
will be on things like reducing cost-of-living pressure and increasing job
security,” he said.
Same-sex
unions are available in a majority of Australian states but because marriage
comes under federal legislation these couples are not formally recognized as
married by the government.
Gay rights
group Australian Marriage Equality welcomed Rudd’s commitment, but said it
meant nothing unless Abbott also agreed to a vote. “Kevin Rudd can’t achieve
this reform by himself, he needs the Coalition to also have a conscience vote
if this reform is to have a fighting chance,” AME director Rodney Croome said.
The
National Marriage Coalition, which opposes same-sex unions, insisted children
“have a right to a mother and a father.”
“We call
upon all parties to focus on what matters most to Australians, guiding the
nation always to a better future,” spokesman Gerard Calilhanna said.
Agence France-Presse

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.