Google – AFP, 11 June 2013
![]() |
A soldier
stands guard in front of late president Ho Chi Minh's mausoleum
in Hanoi on
October 22, 2012 (AFP/File, Hoang Dinh Nam)
|
HANOI —
Vietnam's premier suffered a setback Tuesday after a third of lawmakers in the
one-party state voted against him in a first ever confidence vote, seen as a
bid to deflect growing public anger at the communist regime.
One hundred
and sixty of some 500 lawmakers voiced "low confidence" in Prime
Minister Nguyen Tan Dung's premiership, which has been tainted by a string of
corruption scandals and worries over his handling of the ailing economy.
"Dung's
results are a disaster," Vietnam expert Carl Thayer told AFP, adding that
the premier "will be chastened by the result but will continue in
office".
The
breakdown highlights a lingering factional dispute, he said, with Dung's main
rival President Truong Tan Sang ranked third in terms of "high
confidence" votes while the premier was placed 25th.
![]() |
Vietnam
Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung (L) is
shown in Hanoi, May 20, 2013 (AFP/File,
Hoang
Dinh Nam)
|
Other top
officials also scored poorly in the new annual vote with the central bank
governor receiving "low confidence" votes from more than 40 percent
of lawmakers.
Lawmakers
could express "low confidence", "confidence", or "high
confidence" in the officials. Those with more than 50 percent "low
confidence" votes for two consecutive years could be asked to resign,
state media said.
All 47
officials secured the 50 percent support needed in Monday's ballot to avoid
possible future disciplinary measures.
While the
vote was broadly welcomed as a sign the regime is trying to respond to public
dissatisfaction, the actual results were dismissed as largely meaningless by
many local observers -- who had warned that officials would close ranks behind
the scenes to support each other regardless of performance.
"There
is nothing surprising," political analyst Nguyen Quang A told AFP,
describing the absence of a "no confidence" option on the ballot as
"ridiculous".
Public
anger at the government's handling of the economy, a lingering banking crisis
and woefully inadequate public healthcare and education is reflected in the
"low confidence" votes, he said.
But as
receiving a higher number of "low confidence" votes will have no
discernible impact on officials' careers, the exercise was "not a
significant gesture", he said.
The
Communist Party tightly controls public debate and routinely imprisons
dissidents who question the authoritarian political system or call for change,
but tech-savvy Vietnamese often use the Internet to express their
dissatisfaction.
"If
the public had been allowed to vote, the officials would have lost
immediately," wrote popular blogger Nguyen Quang Lap in one widely shared
posting.
The vote
was hailed as "historic" by the official Vietnam News Agency, but
prominent pro-democracy campaigners dismissed the exercise as a charade.
Dissident
Pham Hong Son, who spent five years in jail for his activism and is currently
on hunger strike to support another detained activist, said the process lacked
credibility.
"This
is just new validation for the authoritarian regime -- a new cover for them.
Ultimately, they are only doing this kind of thing to maintain the sole power
of the Communist Party," he told AFP from his home in Hanoi.
Octogenarian
activist Le Hien Duc agreed, saying the vote was "not objective because
everything was decided in advance by the party".


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.