BBC News, Karishma
Vaswani, Jakarta, 27 March 2013
![]() |
| Both India and Indonesia are growing fast, but lately the smaller of the two has seen its economy expand the fastest |
Related
Stories
Entry into
the Brics club is a seen as a sign of success - a statement that you have made
it as an emerging economy.
When the
phrase was first coined back in 2001 by Jim O'Neill from Goldman Sachs he
intended it to encompass just four fast growing emerging-market countries -
Brazil, Russia, India and China.
South
Africa was added in 2011 - despite protestations from Mr O'Neill.
Being a
part of Brics means you are instantly branded a sure bet - or at least that is
the perception among investors.
Economists
say the Brics make up approximately 20% of global gross domestic product (GDP),
and by 2030 could possibly rival the combined economies of the G7 countries
(the US, Canada, the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Japan).
But already
there are concerns that the fast growing economies of the grouping are seeing
some trouble ahead.
'Policy
paralysis'
Take India,
which once saw its economy growing at a rate of 9%, but is now suffering from
"policy paralysis", caused by a combination of stalling economic
reforms and political haggling, according to Ajit Ranade, chief economist with
the Aditya Birla Group.
![]() |
| Corruption and political inefficiency are often cited as reasons why India's growth rate is slower than it was |
"But
fundamentally, India's economy is still stable, its medium-term growth drivers
are intact. Some policy momentum is visible these days."
The Indian
government says it expects the country to grow between 6.1% and 6.7% this year,
faster than in 2012, when GDP grew by 5.3%.
Middle
class
The
slowdown in economic growth in India lies behind the suggestion that perhaps
Indonesia should be the "I" in Brics instead.
On the face
of it, India and Indonesia's economies have a lot in common - certainly more
than just their first initials.
Both have
large and young populations in fast growing economies driven mainly by domestic
consumption.
But India's
economy is six or seven times the size of Indonesia's, and it has many more
mouths to feed, with a population of more than 1.2 billion compared with
Indonesia's 240 million.
While India
has seen its economy stumble recently after many years of strong growth,
Indonesia's strengths have made it the darling of international investors -
although it too has also seen economic growth decline moderately.
The two
nations also face many of the same problems, with their messy political
systems, shoddy infrastructure in desperate need of upgrading, corruption and
crippling poverty.
Open
economy
One of the
comments you always hear about Indonesia's potential is the rapid emergence of
its affluent middle class, which is set to almost double by 2020 to 141 million
people, the Boston Consulting Group forecasts, which means more than half the
population would be classified as middle-income class or richer. Domestic
consumption helps power the economy and attracts plenty of foreign companies
into this relatively open economy.
India has a
large domestic market too, but restrictions on foreign ownership make it
difficult for foreign firms to get involved.
![]() |
| Leaders of the Brics group of emerging market economies are meeting in Durban |
The company
has also opened a research and development facility in India and now sees both
markets as equally important, according to Vismay Sharma, L'Oreal's president
in Indonesia, who has also worked in India.
Bricsi?
Indonesia's
growing importance relative to India has done little to remove some of the real
challenges for retailers and distributors doing business here, however, such as
the fact that it is made up of islands.
"You
can't use road or rail everywhere, so you end up using ships," says Mr
Sharma.
"You
end up depending on ports, and that starts to put a lot of strain on the
infrastructure."
Neither
India nor Indonesia have good infrastructure, and both governments have pledged
to spend billions of dollars to improve it.
But such
lofty ambitions do not always deliver results. Last year, a much-lauded land
acquisition bill was passed in Indonesia, but it has failed in its ambition to
make it easier for the government to push ahead with infrastructure projects.
Obstacles
such as these have resulted in analysts dismissing the idea that India should
be replaced by Indonesia in the Brics grouping.
"You
can add it as a sixth Brics, perhaps, making it Bricsi," says PK Basu,
regional head of Maybank in Singapore.
"But
replacing India doesn't make sense from any perspective. It's the first year in
the last 15 years that Indonesia's real GDP grew faster than India. There's a
dynamism in the Indian economy - in manufacturing, agriculture, services - that
just isn't there in Indonesia."
HS Dillon,
Indonesia's special adviser on poverty alleviation, agrees.
Each nation
has moved into fast-growing economy status, each taking its own path to get
there, but neither country has "made it", he says, insisting that
"the rate of growth means nothing without the quality of growth".
Widespread
poverty is there for all to see just a few kilometres outside of Jakarta's
fancy financial district, where urban slums have cropped up in many parts of
the city, as migrants from other parts of the archipelago have come here to
find work. India's big cities too have seen mass migration into fast-growing
cities that are becoming increasingly densely packed.
The poor in
both countries are prone to avoidable diseases, resulting from poor sanitation,
regular flooding and a lack of affordable healthcare.
"People
say all the time we are one of the largest economies in the world, we are in
the G20, we are this, we are that," says Mr Dillon.
"But
what," he asks, "does that mean for the poor?"



No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.