Deutsche Welle, 18 December 2012
Syria's
vice president wants to negotiate with the opposition. In an interview he
suggested the idea of a transitional government - but the opposition is
hesitant to sit down and talk with the hated regime.
If weapons
are no longer getting you anywhere, then it's time for words. That seems to be
what the Syrian Vice President Farouk al-Sharaa was saying in an interview with
Lebanese daily Al Akhbar on Monday (17.12.2012). In the interview, al-Sharaa
admitted indirectly that the Assad government no longer believed a military
victory over the rebels was possible.
The
conflict could not be won by either side militarily, he said. Instead of
further destroying the country, it was therefore better to strive for a
ceasefire and to begin negotiations on a unity government. Syria's neighbors
and the UN Security Council would also have to be involved in this
"historic solution" to the conflict, al-Sharaa said.
Walid
al-Bunni, a veteran with the Syrian opposition, was hesitant about al-Sharaa's
offer. He told the dpa news agency in Beirut that the offer came too late.
"And we can not accept that people who kill the Syrian people will remain
in power," he added.
Assad seeks
military solution
What makes
al-Sharaa's statement so interest is the fact that it does not seem to stem
from any new awareness by the government but merely out of necessity: there
just doesn't seem to be any other option anymore. Al-Sharaa admits that Bashar
Assad himself actually prefers a different solution: "He doesn't hide his
preference for a military solution - a solution which would lead to a final
victory. If there were to be a political dialogue after that, it would be based
on the [military] facts."
![]() |
| The Free Syrian Army says they're making steady advances |
But it
could be that those facts have changed in a way that the regime doesn't believe
a military solution is possibly anymore. Several days ago, Sadiq al-Mousllie, a
spokesman for the Syrian National Council in Germany, said that the opposition
Free Syrian Army had made significant progress in fighting the government
troops: "The regime is being pushed back ever further."
Doubts
among the allies
That seems
to be Iran's view too. The country is one of Assad's closest allies, but Tehran
has also called for a national reconciliation committee with the task of
preparing for a transitional government.
Doubts are
also growing in Moscow. The Russian government no longer seems to think the fall
of Assad all that unlikely. But, according to political analyst Raghida Dergham
writing in the daily Al Hayat, it might be too late for a credible change of
policy from the Kremlin.
She says
that Russia is paying a hefty price for Putin's policy on Syria: "The
Kremlin is losing its connection with Syria as well as with the whole region.
It's too late for any big deal, and that means it's too late for Russia to play
a forward-looking and honorable role in the region."
Should the
offer by Syria's vice president be serious, this could be an opportunity to
prevent more bloodshed. But it's unlikely that all the fighters on both sides
would uphold a ceasefire: too much blood has been shed for words to be able to
replace weapons from one day to the next.


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.