guardian.co.uk,
Tania Branigan in Beijing, Sunday 18 March 2012
![]() |
| Xi Jinping, who is expected to take over as general secretary, then president of China. Photograph: Reuters |
It was the
greatest political upheaval in years, but it may not be the last. China's
dramatic ousting of the leadership contender Bo Xilai on Friday may have been
an anomaly – or it may be a sign of trouble ahead as the world's second largest
economy prepares for a once in a decade power transition.
This
autumn, the 18th Communist party congress will formally select the next general
secretary and other members of China's top political body. Since power flows
from the party, the decision – in reality, made before the meeting – will
determine who will lead the country and how they will govern its 1.4 billion
inhabitants. Bo's high-profile campaigning, which unsettled other leaders, was
only the most visible sign of the jockeying for position.
"My
guess is that it's going to be a bumpier ride than 10 years ago," said
Jean-Pierre Cabestan, of Hong Kong Baptist University.
Wu Qiang, a
political scientist at Tsinghua University, said: "This is the most
intense moment in the past 15 years and could have a big impact on society. The
upcoming political competition is healthy and worth anticipating, but could
potentially result in instability."
This is the
first transition that has not been shaped by the founders of the People's
Republic; President Hu Jintao was picked out by Deng Xiaoping. His ascension
was the first relatively straightforward succession in its history.
Xi Jinping
will almost certainly become general secretary, then president of China, with
Li Keqiang as premier. The rest of the incumbents are expected to make way for
newer faces – and perhaps the first woman ever to reach the body.
They will
face a far more difficult time than their predecessors, said Cheng Li, a
specialist on China's elite politics at the Brookings Institution in
Washington.
"There
are serious economic, political and social challenges. State monopolies,
inflation, a property bubble, huge local debts – each of those things is so
overwhelming," he said. "Internationally, China faces a very
uncertain and complicated environment. It's not a very nice picture."
China is
vastly wealthier and more powerful than when Hu Jintao took power a decade ago.
Yet analysts say his legacy is one of maintenance: keeping GDP growth high and
preserving party consensus. Critics complain that even much-needed measures,
such as improvements to social welfare, have skirted the underlying issues.
Breakneck
economic development has come at vast social and environmental cost. Corruption
is rife; cynicism more so. While millions have emerged from poverty, many feel
worse off – perhaps because inequality has soared. Protests and other
disturbances are increasing. This year has seen fresh unrest in Tibetan and
Uighur areas. Even the demographics look grim, with a rapidly ageing
population.
Reforms
have reached a critical stage, the outgoing premier, Wen Jiabao, warned last week. Political changes are necessary to reform the economy – and without them,
China risks another historical tragedy like the cultural revolution, he said.
Some see
Wen as disingenuous; others as isolated. He has repeatedly called for change,
though never quite so strongly, and little has happened.
Zhang Jian,
of Peking University, noted: "There's a strong demand from civil society
for more reforms … I don't see a serious or reliable force within the party
that really wants them."
But Russell
Leigh Moses, a political analyst in Beijing, suggested that on economic issues,
at least, "there's a good deal of healthy rethinking in leadership
circles".
A
government research body co-wrote last month's World Bank report calling for
economic reforms; Li Keqiang reportedly arranged the collaboration.
"I
feel a polarisation process between conservatives and reformers on substantive
political issues and fundamental orientations is going on," said Cabestan.
"The big uncertainty is whether something creates a showdown."
Opportunities
for change will depend on who joins the standing committee of the politburo,
the top political body, and who takes other senior roles. The general secretary
is now first among equals, not a paramount leader like Mao Zedong or Deng
Xiaoping.
Since them,
"the committee has been led by all the members together and the factional
fighting has been fierce", said Zhang Ming, a political scientist at
Renmin University of China in Beijing.
The
leadership is often divided into "princelings" like Xi – the sons of
powerful Communist leaders – and members of Hu's Communist Youth League
faction. But such distinctions not only reflect the importance of connections
and powerful patrons; to some extent they are used as a proxy for political
differences.
This
autumn's promotions will offer clues to Xi's ability to impose his will, as
will the speed with which he takes over as chair of the party's central
military commission.
The
standing committee "will also tell us about policy orientation – whether
it will be a status quo leadership or one ready to take more daring decisions,
initiate more reforms and to some degree take risks", said Cabestan.
"If,
for example, Wang Yang [the Guangdong party boss seen as relatively reformist]
is promoted to a key position, that may make a difference."
Meaningful
change – particularly political reform – will be hard to effect, Cheng Li
warned.
The
National People's Congress's 70 richest members added more to their wealth last
year than the combined net worth of the US Congress, the president and his
cabinet and the US supreme court justices, Bloomberg reported recently.
Their
average worth of $1.28bn not only makes the favourite for the Republican
presidential candidacy, Mitt Romney, look impecunious; it indicates how intertwined
political and economic power have become.
"The
big question for Xi [is] whether behind his smile and urbane manner he can
really be tough when he needs to be," said Cabestan.
Kerry
Brown, director of the Asia programme at Chatham House in London, said:
"For me, 2012 onwards is going to be a transition from GDP growth to
sociopolitical change and the return of politicians; technocrats being replaced
by people who actually have to communicate to the public what the policy
options are and which choices should be taken and try to build not just
consensus in the party, but in society.
"The
new leaders are more reformist in their provincial levels. It's a question of
what they attack and the speed at which they take those issues.
"I
guess they will be gradualist and my instinct is that they will have to hit
these quicker than they expected. Tensions have grown and it isn't
sustainable."
Related Articles:
"A Summary" – Apr 2, 2011 (Kryon channelled by Lee Caroll) (Subjects: Religion, Shift of Human Consciousness, 2012, Intelligent/Benevolent Design, EU, South America, 5 Currencies, Water Cycle (Heat up, Mini Ice Ace, Oceans, Fish, Earthquakes ..), Middle East, Internet, Israel, Dictators, Palestine, US, Japan (Quake/Tsunami Disasters , People, Society ...), Nuclear Power Revealed, Hydro Power, Geothermal Power, Moon, Financial Institutes (Recession, Realign integrity values ..) , China, North Korea, Global Unity,..... etc.) - (Text version)
“….. Here is the prediction: China will turn North Korea loose soon. The alliance will dissolve, or become stale. There will be political upheaval in China. Not a coup and not a revolution. Within the inner circles of that which you call Chinese politics, there will be a re-evaluation of goals and monetary policy. Eventually, you will see a break with North Korea, allowing still another dictator to fall and unification to occur with the south. ….”

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.