guardian.co.uk,
Tania Branigan in Taipei, Saturday 14
January 2012
![]() |
| Supporters of Taiwan's President Ma Ying-jeou cheer on as they watch the vote counting on Saturday. Photograph: Wally Santana/AP |
The rain
that swept the city streets, blurring lights and muffling the blare of klaxons,
perhaps helped to dampen passions. Outside the Kuomintang's Taipei
headquarters, the victors smiled under thin plastic hoods, cheering in relief
as much as in celebration. Across town, the defeated opposition's supporters
seemed subdued.
Taiwanese
politics are vibrant, emotional, sometimes dirty and occasionally violent. Some
might have expected stronger reactions after a race too close to call
culminated in yesterday's re-election of incumbent Ma Ying-jeou, who has
overseen an unprecedented rapprochement with China.
But the
muted response to his victory – he took 51.6% of the vote to challenger Tsai
Ing-wen's 45.6% – echoed an unusually calm campaign. Some observers think this
youthful democracy's fifth presidential election offers hope that its politics
are evolving from what one voter described as "two parties shouting at
each other".
The
improved performance by the Democratic Progressive party (DPP) also indicates
that voters will continue to have an alternative to the Kuomintang. Some had
feared the party was sliding to oblivion after its disastrous performance in
2008. Ma saw off an impressive campaign by the DPP's Tsai, who would have been
the first female president. "This is not my personal victory; this victory
belongs to the Taiwanese people," the 61-year-old told supporters.
Tsai
stepped down as DPP leader as she conceded defeat. A third candidate, James
Soong of the People First party, polled just 2.8% of the vote.
The result was a relief for Beijing, displeased by the re-emergence of the
pro-independence DPP, despite Tsai's care in moderating the party's rhetoric.
The election was watched closely in Washington, amid fears of potential
instability.
"Beijing,
Washington and even Australia will all breathe better with a Ma victory,"
Bruce Jacobs, a China expert at Monash University in Australia, told the Associated
Press.
Beijing
claims sovereignty over the self-governed island and has refused to rule out
military action if Taiwan declares formal independence. But hostility has
softened under Ma, under whose regime the two sides have struck an important economic
deal and established the first direct air, postal and shipping links since the
defeated Kuomintang retreated across the strait after losing the Chinese civil
war six decades ago.
While polls
had shown Tsai edging towards her rival at one point, the scale of the victory
gave Ma an unequivocal mandate, said Jonathan Sullivan, an expert on Taiwan at
Nottingham University. "Ma was very clear about what he was offering ...
if people didn't want that they had the opportunity to say so."
The
Kuomintang campaign suggested voters faced a choice between the benefits of the
closer economic ties he has forged and uncertainty under Tsai. Meanwhile, the
DPP accused Ma of failing ordinary voters and pledged to improve the lives of
workers.
It is not
hard to find diehard supporters on either side who accuse the Kuomintang of
selling out Taiwan or the DPP of being dangerous firebrands.
But one DPP
activist sought to put the contest into a broader perspective. "If we win
or lose – to me, even getting here today is a remarkable achievement,"
said Chiu Chui-chen, hours before polls opened. Chiu, 61, spent five years in
prison during the 1980s due to his pro-democracy activities. Back then, he had
struggled to imagine voting. That Taiwan did not see presidential elections
until 1996, and elected its first non-Kuomintang leader four years later, helps
explain why politics is a passion here.
The closing
rallies on Friday night epitomised the carnival spirit, with tens of thousands
packing each venue. Their roars of approval rivalled the volume of bullhorns
and vuvuzelas as they waved flags and cheered their candidates on. Outside the
Bancai sports stadium, where Tsai held her final event, vendors did a brisk
trade in T-shirts, dolls and other campaign paraphenalia.
Hours
later, voters clambered onto buses and trains, travelling hours across the
island to reach their registered polling station. Around 200,000 returned from
overseas to cast their vote.
Across the
Taiwan strait, where the Chinese Communist party has limited coverage of the
contest, at least some Chinese citizens were watching. The popular Sina Weibo
microblog service even posted an election counter. "Saw Taiwan election on
Weibo. I hope China can have elections too. But the country's situation doesn't
allow that," wrote one user.
In Taipei,
Chinese tour groups said they had been told to stay away from campaigning and
some had even been told to stay inside on polling day. "[China's leaders]
don't want a lot of mainlanders coming here and watching democracy in
action," said Stanley Rosen of the University of Southern California, who
was in Taiwan to watch the election. "They like to show the legislature
and people fighting each other... [It's the idea that] democracy is inherently
unstable."
Taiwan's
electoral history is certainly troubled. In the most notorious incident, DPP
incumbent Chen Shui-bian was shot on the eve of the 2004 poll. The incident
remains controversial, not least because of its impact on the next day's vote,
which he won by just 0.2%; opponents claimed he had staged it.
This race
has seen allegations – denied by Ma – that intelligence services spied on Tsai
for the Kuomintang's political benefit. That resonated because of the party's
authoritarian history. Meanwhile, Tsai denied Kuomintang claims that she had
benefited inappropriately from a role in a state-backed business.
But Kevin
Hsu, the 24-year-old policy director of the First Voters group – a body
encouraging political participation by the young – said that overall the
campaign had benefited Taiwanese democracy.
"Compared
with the [previous] elections, it's been peaceful and reasonable. We haven't
had unrest. We haven't had bullets. Our democracy is young, but it's a learning
process every four years."
Yu
Chen-hua, of the election study centre at National Chengchi University, noted
that there had not been "much passion" in the race. Tsai had reached
out to voters with a more rational tone than predecessors, who had tended to
use strong rhetoric to consolidate support, he said.
"There
were doubts in the DPP about whether Tsai had the right kind of personality
because she is very much like a university professor, rather than a street
fighter," said Christopher Hughes of the London School of Economics. But
her "academic, pragmatic style" had turned out to be a real asset for
the DPP, he added. He suggested she had alienated voters by returning to
old-school street campaigning tactics in the last week. Even so, she restored
her party's credibility after the last election, when Ma crushed Frank Hsieh
with 58% of the vote to 42% .
"It
has shown the two-party system is strong. In 2008, there were real fears that
the DPP was finished," said Hughes.
The
Kuomintang has a reduced majority thanks to the simultaneous legislative
election, although it still boasts 64 seats to the DPP's 40. Smaller parties
claimed nine places. About 74% of Taiwan's 18 million voters are thought to
have cast a ballot on Saturday, slightly below 2008 figures.
Despite the
cooler tone of the race, voters said young Taiwanese people still cared about
politics. "My generation is not as aggressive [about politics] as the
people you always see on TV. People have got more rational," said Joseph
Chiu, a 30-year-old salesman. "But it's not that they are less passionate
or that they are indifferent. They have just learned to respect each
other."
Related Articles:

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.